Monday, September 29, 2014

For years, the United States has lagged behind the rest of the world’s large markets in the adoption of Europay, MasterCard and Visa (EMV) technology to reduce magnetic-strip card-related fraud. Today, in the wake of massive and much publicized security breaches among U.S. retailers and increased card fraud losses, the United States is moving to widespread EMV adoption and the use of integrated circuit cards, commonly referred to as Chip-n-Pin or smart cards. By themselves, however, these regulations won't prevent all payment card fraud, nor will they mitigate the financial and brand risks associated with fraud.
The new technology is aimed at reducing card fraud resulting from counterfeit, lost or stolen cards. In addition to the transition costs -- and perhaps more importantly -- grocers could find themselves on the hook for fraudulent transactions that were previously absorbed by card issuers. This could prove to be a larger-than-expected financial liability for unprepared grocers, merchants and their executive leadership teams.

First Step

Payment security has gained the attention of CEOs and boardrooms alike, and is beginning to compete with e-commerce and customer engagement as the most discussed topic in the retail industry. The reality is that EMV adoption is just the first step toward a more cohesive payment acceptance and processing strategy, embracing mobile and online payment and customer engagement considerations, to complement a grocer’s core business strategy. The advantage is not just in terms of risk avoidance and mitigation, but also in terms of improved customer engagement through the true currency of digital payments: trust.
Most grocers may not understand the total amount of fraud they generate today via their transactions. While grocers are aware of -- and are currently liable for -- knowingly fraudulent transactions, this represents only a portion of total fraud now absorbed by financial institutions and card issuers. That's because card issuers build the cost of card-present fraud into their transaction model. The true amount of fraud is hidden from view and offset by the transaction costs charged to grocers.
Grocers using their current level of card-present fraud in future financial scenarios could be unprepared for the amount of fraudulent transactions billed back to them once the new rules are in place.

More Fraud Protection

While many grocers are focused on the purchase or upgrade of more secure POS terminals, successful EMV adoption requires more than a technology solution. And, although EMV is more secure than magnetic-strip cards, it won't stop all criminal card fraud activity. Beyond preparing for the immediate transition to EMV, grocers should consider additional fraud prevention measures to help avoid large security breaches, including network security, malware protection, end-to-end encryption, and tokenization of card data to render any stolen information unusable.
Other emerging needs include the resources, data and tools required to monitor, detect and manage fraud events. The banking industry has invested heavily in monitoring and alerts to detect and analyze fraud behavior, and grocers should now consider developing similar analytic capabilities. The analysis should encompass not only transaction fraud at the payment location, but also consumer buying behaviors and macro trends. As EMV gains wider adoption, fraud will move to other avenues such as card not present for e-commerce transactions, and emerging alternative payment methods. Including proactive monitoring and analytics in your payment strategy is crucial to protecting your customers and managing the risk to your brand.
The security of payment processing is important to customers, and the ability of grocers to secure payments will be an ongoing challenge. Developing an effective strategy is the first step in proactive planning, rather than reacting to regulatory and/or fraudulent events.

WHAT IS INTERNET OF THINGS?

The Internet of Things (IoT) is a scenario in which objects, animals or people are provided with unique identifiers and the ability to automatically transfer data over a network without requiring human-to-human or human-to-computer interaction. In simple words, everything is connected over IP and would interact would each other based on pre-defined logic, e.g. refrigerator can order milk by itself when it is about to get over based on past consumption trends.
The keyword is “Things”. Here things includes people and animals which means that in future even the people might be connected to objects like health equipment or household appliances. This might sound straight out of a science fiction movie but that is how human to machine and machine to machine interactions are likely to take place. IoT describes a system where items in the physical world, and sensors within or attached to these items, are connected to the Internet via wireless and wired Internet connections. These sensors can use various types of local area connections such as RFID, NFC, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and Zigbee. Sensors can also have wide area connectivity such as GSM, GPRS, 3G, and LTE. In summary, the Internet of Things will:
1. Connect both inanimate and living things
2. Use sensors for data collection
3. Identify, track and communicate with objects over IP network
IPv6′s huge increase in address space is an important factor in the development of the Internet of Things. With IPv6, it is possible to assign a unique IP address to each atom on earth and still not run out of IP addresses.

EXAMPLES OF INTERNET OF THINGS

There are multiple ways in which Internet of Things can be used to drive the economic value across sectors. Today, we have a few examples of IoT but it is just the tip of the iceberg and many new use cases would emerge in the future. Some of the prominent examples are as follows:
1. Home Automation - home automation has become the central battlefield of the Internet of Things. This is probably the first and most celebrated use case of Internet of Things. Many houses are moving towards some form of home automation though this area is still evolving and currently very rudimentary form of home automation is being used.
2. Smart water systems and meters - The cities of Doha, Sao Paulo, and Beijing have reduced leaks by 40 to 50% by putting sensors on pumps and other water infrastructure. Smart metres are being used for preventing electricity pilferage and balancing grid loads.
3. Connected advertising and marketing - Cisco believes that this category (think Internet-connected billboards) will be one of the top three IoT categories, along with smart factories, and telecommuting support systems.
4. Healthcare - Hospitalized patients whose physiological status requires close attention can be constantly monitored using IoT-driven, non invasive monitoring using sensors. Remote patient monitoring is also a possibility by securely capturing patient health data from a variety of sensors, apply complex algorithms to analyze the data and then share it through wireless connectivity with medical professionals who can make appropriate health recommendations.
5. Public transportation/smart cities - London iBus system is a good example. It works with information from over 8,000 buses that are fitted with GPS capabilities alongside various other sensors which relay data about the vehicle’s location and current progress so bus stop signposts can display details of a bus’s impending arrival.

MATURITY OF INTERNET OF THINGS AND MARKET FORECAST

Internet of Things is still in infancy and would take over 10 year to get to mainstream. The Gartner hype cycle for emerging technologies (refer image below) clearly shows that the Internet of Things is still in the “Peak of Inflated Expectations” and it is still long way from reaching significant adoption.
As per Gartner forecast made in Dec, 2013, the Internet of Things (IoT), which excludes PCs, tablets and smartphones, will grow to 26 billion units installed in 2020 representing an almost 30-fold increase from 0.9 billion in 2009. Gartner said that IoT product and service suppliers will generate incremental revenue exceeding $300 billion, mostly in services, in 2020. It will result in $1.9 trillion in global economic value-add (which represents the aggregate benefits that businesses derive through the sale and usage of IoT technology) across sectors in 2020. The verticals that are leading its adoption are manufacturing (15 percent), healthcare (15 percent) and insurance (11 percent).
The potential for IoT is huge. The chart on the right shows the potential of Internet of Things with respect to some of the successful inventions of the digital space. Clearly, the potential is larger than anything till date but for that a lot of players in the ecosystem will need to come together and make IoT a reality.

KEY PLAYERS IN INTERNET OF THINGS

The evolving vendor ecosystem that is emerging to enable the Internet of Things continues to be extremely fragmented and includes a wide variety of small emergent players. A number of start-ups and established players are showing interest. I see the players broadly in two major categories
1. Platform Builders: These players would be the building blocks for internet of things like the carriers/MNO, OEMs, systems integrator, chip vendors, infrastructure services (device management, data modelling, etc. ), Analytics, etc.
2. Vertical Industry Players: These players would develop industry specific solutions on top of the platform builders, e.g. Nest Labs in energy efficiency

Record number of Americans are now affected by food insecurity that is only exacerbated by social programs

(NaturalNews) Food insecurity describes a lack of certainty for a household's next meal, not enough nutritious food or a lack of stability of household food supplies. In the USA, this issue is debatable somewhat, because what constitutes real nutritious food diverges considerably from the most common perceptions of food.

Nevertheless, food insecurity describes a condition of not having steady access to edibles, whatever they are. Forget the nutritious part for now. That's not part of the standard American diet (SAD). Statistically, there are many households whose steady access to food is unstable, even with one or more working.

One NGO volunteer group, Feeding America, claims that one in five American children live in a household that experiences some level of food insecurity. The focus on children is mostly for their need to grow healthily and not be affected mentally by improper nutrition while in school.

Here's part of a report from Feeding America, a non-profit group with a national network of 200 food banks to distribute food for the needy:

According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), in 2012, 15.9 million children under 18 in the United States live in this condition -- unable to consistently access nutritious and adequate amounts of food necessary for a healthy life. According to Map the Meal Gap... 20% or more of the child population in 38 states and D.C. lived in foodinsecure households in 2011.

Some school programs do have free lunch programs for those who qualify. Then there are the summer months. Some states' school lunch programs automatically cater to immigrants,legal or illegal.

That is an area of righteous concern for many US citizens who are living paycheck to paycheck without any safety net. Many of whom are near the Federal Poverty Line (FPL) but still not eligible for federal or state assistance.

For example, the FPL for a household of three in mainland USA for medicaid is $17,900 annually. The FPL table's figure at 133 percent FPL is $26,321. Though there are some variations from state to state, the gross annual income of 130 percent FPL is used to qualify for SNAP.

Qualifying for federal assistance food programs

Formerly known as the Food Stamp Program, the USDA's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) has taken it's place. Notice the word nutrition creeping into the title.

One might ask in our society, what does nutrition have to do with it? Better to stick with the word food, which at least includes fast food, processed food and the ubiquitous junk food. That would be more appropriate.

So to qualify for food purchasing assistance regardless of nutritional shortcomings, SNAP requires a family of three to earn at or under $2,116 gross monthly (before taxes) and/or $1,628 net monthly (after taxes).

The guidelines for what constitutes income or ready assets varies between states more than the income levels. Most ignore income from disability programs or short-term income assistance programs.

States have different amounts that they consider as ready cash from a back savings or checking account. Some states count the net value of the only vehicle owned, but most don't. Net value implies the difference between what's owed and the lower Blue Book value.

Maybe some states assume that you'll sell your only mode of transportation in order to get a week's worth of groceries. And what about those who don't quite qualify? They may wind up flirting with food insecurity or forced into buying low-quality food-like materials

Few know or want to bother with buying or cooking low-cost organic bulk grains, dry legumes, fresh organic potatoes and greens to cover a sufficient amount of nutritional foods inexpensively. Most are too busy rushing around to work, taking kids to school and watching TV.

They're feeding themselves cheap processed foods and factory farm meats that will make them fatter while keeping them undernourished. Depending on how a family of three has its liveable income determined, they would be eligible for a maximum of $497 monthly to use with their EBT (Electronic Benefit Transfer) card.

Actually, the ratio of cheap food consumers to quality food preparers is not much different for non-food stamp recipients. There are some exceptions among SNAP recipients who do manage to get high-quality food.

Sources:

http://www.rti.org

http://www.rti.org [PDF]

http://familiesusa.org

http://www.fns.usda.gov

http://feedingamerica.org


Learn more:http://www.naturalnews.com/047054_food_security_social_programs_federal_assistance.html#ixzz3Eipv4J00


Orange Juice Searches for a 

Fresher Image

The Onetime Breakfast Staple Falls Victim to 

Changing Tastes and Diets

Updated Sept. 26, 2014 5:33 p.m. ET

The Florida Department of Citrus is hoping its remade Captain Citrus mascot will help give orange-juice consumption a jolt. Florida Department of Citrus/Reuters
Plagued by plummeting demand for their juice and a deadly tree disease, Florida's orange growers are calling on a higher power. His name is Captain Citrus.
Earlier this month, the Florida Department of Citrus revamped its mascot with the help of Marvel Entertainment from a green-caped orange wielding a carton of juice to a muscular young man in a skintight yellow-and-orange suit, powered by the sun.
The agency, which is funded by a tax on oranges grown in Florida, hopes a series of custom comic books featuring Captain Citrus alongside the rest of Marvel's popular Avengers characters will help recruit a new generation of orange-juice drinkers.
With Americans giving orange juice the cold shoulder, producers and growers are looking for ways to refresh its image. As dietary awareness has grown, the sugar content of the onetime breakfast-table staple has damaged its reputation as a health drink. And it is getting crowded out of the beverage aisle by upstarts including coconut water, aƧai juice and energy drinks.
Per capita orange-juice consumption is down 45% from its 1998 peak, having fallen to 3.2 gallons a person in 2012 from 5.8 gallons 16 years ago, according to the most recent data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Orange juice's waning popularity presents a challenge to PepsiCo Inc.,maker of Tropicana, and Coca-Cola Co. , which produces the Minute Maid and Simply brands.
In its second-quarter earnings release at the end of July, Coke said sales volume in its still-beverage category, which includes teas, waters, sports drinks and juices, grew 5% world-wide during the quarter. That was no thanks to the company's juice and juice-drink sales, which suffered a 1% decline "stemming from price increases taken in North America to cover higher input costs."
Pepsi doesn't break out its juice results.
Orange-juice makers have been paying more for the fruit due to limited supplies after a bacterial disease—so-called citrus greening—ravaged the U.S. crop.
For the season that ends this month, Florida produced its smallest crop in 29 years. Meanwhile, consumers are having to pay more; for the four weeks ended Aug. 30, orange juice prices averaged $6.46 a gallon, up 4.5% from a year earlier, according to data from Nielsen.
Coke did boost sales in its juice division last year after introducing new blends under its Simply brand, including combinations of orange with banana and lemonade with blueberry, the company said.
Beverage companies also are experimenting with diluting their juice. Pepsi sells Trop50, which it markets as the lower-sugar, lower-calorie version of its Tropicana brand, made with alternative sweetener from the stevia plant, an herb native to parts of South America. Coke offers a 50-calorie version of Minute Maid that is 42% orange juice.
Both Pepsi and Coke are already grappling with weak sales growth in their flagship sodas as more consumers turn away from sugary beverages. The beverage industry's response—an ever-widening array of new options, like energy drinks and vitamin water—is serving to hasten orange juice's decline, analysts say.
In August, Coke announced a $2.15 billion investment for a 16.7% stake in energy-drink maker Monster Beverage Corp.
The growing list of beverage options on the market will make it hard for orange juice sales to recover even if sugar fears ease, analysts say.
"Orange juice is at risk of becoming a niche product," said Ross Colbert, global beverage strategist at Rabobank in New York. That said, orange juice is still a $3.5 billion business in the U.S., and companies aren't giving up on it.
"The [juice] category provides us with great opportunity to continue to diversify, whether it's by adding additional line extensions, flavor options or creating more light options," a Coca-Cola spokesperson said. The company also has expanded into other areas, like coconut water. In November, Coke completed its acquisition of Zico, a from-concentrate coconut water that comes in multiple flavors. Pepsi acquired not-from-concentrate O.N.E. Coconut Water in 2012.
Orange juice's biggest selling point—that it is a good source of vitamin C—has been overshadowed in recent years by Americans' growing aversion to products with high sugar content. One 8-ounce glass of orange juice contains about 22 grams of sugar, roughly the same as a Hershey's Mr. Goodbar chocolate bar.
Enter Captain Citrus, who—as a costumed character—visits elementary schools in Florida to talk up orange juice's nutritional value. The state citrus agency also has produced television ads touting orange juice as a pick-me-up at any time of day. Sportscaster Erin Andrews, enlisted as a spokeswoman, in August hosted a football-themed event in Manhattan encouraging consumers to use orange juice in game-day foods, such as a marinade for chicken.
Orange trees were brought to Florida by the Spanish. It wasn't until World War II that large-scale production began, after scientists hit upon frozen, concentrated orange juice as a tasty, easily transportable source of vitamin C for soldiers. Their invention hit the consumer market after the war.
Not-from-concentrate orange juice exploded in the 1980s after Tropicana launched a marketing blitz extolling the virtues of its never-frozen juice. Today, reconstituted, or from-concentrate, juice makes up only 40% of the overall orange-juice market, down from 48% a decade ago.
In 2001, the American Academy of Pediatrics began recommending parents serve less fruit juice to young children and steer them to whole fruit instead, which is higher in fiber and contains less sugar per serving.
Orange juice was nowhere to be found at the YMCA in the Greenpoint section of Brooklyn one morning in September, where staff had set out bananas, tangerines and other healthy snacks to attract new members. The only beverage on offer: bottled water.
"When I was younger ... orange juice was the go-to health drink," said Carlos Davila, 37 years old, who oversees exercise programs at the Greenpoint YMCA. After speaking with nutritionists, he now recommends gym members concerned about sugar opt for water instead of juice.
Fruit and vegetable juices' share of the U.S. beverage market, measured in dollars, has fallen to 17% from 24% in 1999. The sports- and energy-drinks category has surged to 16% from 5% of the market over that same period.
Not all companies are as dedicated to juice as Coke and Pepsi. In June, NestlĆ© SA sold its Juicy Juice brand to a private-equity firm in an effort to focus on core businesses like coffee and candy. Others are trying to diversify.
Cutrale Group of Brazil, one of the world's largest growers and processors of oranges—and a chief supplier for Coca-Cola's juice brands—in August proposed to buy U.S. banana giant Chiquita Brands International Inc.
Dan Sleep, chief of the Bureau of Strategic Development at the Florida Department of Agriculture, concedes that increasing consumption of orange juice is a challenge.
The state's citrus department doesn't have the marketing muscle it used to. Its domestic marketing budget is $17.1 million this year, half what it was a decade ago, due to smaller crops. "I don't know how you reverse the [falling] consumption of the juices," said Mr. Sleep. "There's just a huge number of things to choose from."

Natural products: Six steps to supermarket big leagues

Natural products suppliers are vying to introduce new items to supermarkets, but often they don’t understand how this retail channel really works.
Supermarkets are the food retail big leagues. Success here is based on different rules than in natural food stores. That’s something retailers keep telling suppliers, but it needs to be repeatedly emphasized.
Suppliers received excellent advice at SN’s recent educational event held during Natural Products Expo East in Baltimore. The tips came from Mike Anderson, president of Natural/Specialty sales, Acosta Sales & Marketing, and Scott Silverman, vice president of Growth Solutions, KeHE.

• Have a killer pitch

It all begins with this: The product needs to stand out in this intensely competitive retail channel.
A unique brand story — including ingredients and packaging — is what get’s attention, Silverman said.
Another big plus: When a product is first to meet a new health and wellness need not being addressed today, emphasized Anderson.

• Know the field well

There’s no substitute for suppliers being mega-prepared.
“Emerging brands should become masters of the category and competitive set,” Silverman stressed.
That means really understanding the size of the opportunity, and convincing the category manager that a unique new product will make up the sales and profits of whatever it replaces on the shelf, Anderson explained.

• Navigate farm clubs

There are important calculations involved in the precise route of a product to supermarkets.
When representing an entirely new category, compared to a mature one, products are typically first proven in the natural/specialty store channel before getting a shot in supermarkets.
However, recently this appears to be changing somewhat. There are some examples of conventional food retailers, including Target and Kroger, accepting early-stage brands, Anderson observed.

• Please fans on the road

Suppliers who hit it big in their local market could fool themselves into thinking that success will automatically translate elsewhere.
“It’s not as easy when you jump out of your market,” Anderson said. “And you need to hit it out of the park in your local market to get the interest of a corporate buyer.”

• Stay patient in the dugout

It takes time to succeed with supermarkets, so stick with it.
“Don’t be impatient and don’t lose passion,” Silverman said. “And there’s a balance between being tenacious and annoying — don’t be annoying.”

• Continue to run the bases

Achieving supermarket success is a big deal, but after hitting it big, the danger is complacency.

THE SOCIAL-COMMERCE REPORT: Social Networks Are Driving More Online Sales And Influencing Offline Purchases

BII_SCommerce_Chart4BII
There’s been a lot of hype surrounding social commerce — the idea that posts and ads on sites like Facebook and Pinterest would generate lots of immediate sales on e-commerce sites.
Today only a fraction of retailer's online sales are actually generated directly through a referral from a social network. But the volume of social commerce is growing quickly, in the triple digits in many cases. Overall, social commerce sales grew at three times the rate of overall e-commerce last year.
Here are a selection of the key points from the report:


The United States Department of Agricultureplans to announce Monday that it will spend $52 million to support local and regional food systems like farmers’ markets and food hubs and to spur research on organic farming.
The local food movement has been one of the fastest growing segments of the business, as consumers seek to know more about where, how and by whom their food is grown.
But local farmers still struggle to market their food. Distribution systems are intended to accommodate the needs of large-scale commercial farms and growers. Grocery stores and restaurants largely rely on big distribution centers and are only beginning to figure out how to incorporate small batches of produce into their overall merchandise mixes.


Farmers’ markets are proliferating around the country, increasing 76 percent to 8,268 since 2008, according to the Agriculture Department, but they have trouble marketing themselves. And few consumers are aware of a website the department created to help them find a farmers market in their area.
“These types of local food systems are the cornerstones of our plans to revitalize the rural economy,” Tom Vilsack, the agriculture secretary, said in a telephone interview. “If you can connect local produce with markets that are local, money gets rolled around in the local community more directly compared to commercial agriculture where products get shipped in large quantities somewhere else, helping the economy there.”
The $52 million will be the first outlay to local and organic enterprises of thefarm bill signed into law by President Obama in February, which tripled the amount of money aimed at that sector to $291 million. The organic business, which has long complained that the Agriculture Department does not support it financially, will get $125 million over the next five years for research and $50 million for conservation programs.
“It’s a really nice bump for us because we’ve been getting chump change for research,” said Mark Kastel, co-founder of the Cornucopia Institute, an organic research and advocacy group.
Still, Mr. Kastel said that given the growth in the organic business, with about $35 billion in sales in the United States last year, he wished there was more money to study organic practices.
The department will also be putting $30 million a year into marketing programs for farmers markets and promotion of locally grown foods, and has an additional $70 million available as a block grant to support more research on so-called specialty crops, or fruits and vegetables.
“These are significant increases over what it was before I became secretary and certainly over the 2008 bill,” Mr. Vilsack said, referring to the previous omnibus farm bill.
He said local food systems were good investments for government. “Small and medium-sized operations end up helping to generate more employment than commercial operations because of their different distribution systems and their local natures,” Mr. Vilsack said. “And food hubs hire about 20 people on average.”
Mr. Vilsack said there were about 300 food hubs around the country, and he is eager to see more. These enterprises, like Appalachian Sustainable Development in Virginia and La MontaƱita in New Mexico, help small farmers market and distribute their products and offer a variety of other services.