Tuesday, October 31, 2017

We went to one of Target’s new urban stores and saw the company’s vision for the future of retail

target 21Target’s new Herald Square location opened earlier in October.Mark Matousek/Business Insider
  • Target is launching smaller, more streamlined stores in major metropolitan areas.
  • The stores are tailored to their locations with customized inventory and decor.
  • They also highlight products from Target private labels and partnerships.
  • When we visited the new Herald Square location, we noticed how Target was trying to appeal to a younger, more fashionable demographic while introducing features that hint at the future of retail.

In an effort to appeal to customers who live in major metropolitan areas, Target is openingsmall-format stores in some of the biggest US cities including New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago. The stores are designed to reach consumers who live in densely populated areas, far from full-size Target stores.
In addition to their condensed size, the small-format stores feature customized inventory and decor, and some will offer same-day delivery services. Target plans to have more than 75 small-format stores running by 2019.
We visited the new Herald Square location in New York last week to see how Target adapted its sprawling megastores to an urban environment.

We arrived at New York’s new Herald Square location, at 112 W. 34th St. in Manhattan, on a Thursday afternoon.

We arrived at New York's new Herald Square location, at 112 W. 34th St. in Manhattan, on a Thursday afternoon.
Mark Matousek/Business Insider

The store’s first floor highlighted Target clothing lines, like its collaboration with Print All Over Me.

The store's first floor highlighted Target clothing lines, like its collaboration with Print All Over Me.
Mark Matousek/Business Insider

Founded in 2014, Print All Over Me allows its customers to design and purchase vibrantly colored clothes and accessories.

Founded in 2014, Print All Over Me allows its customers to design and purchase vibrantly colored clothes and accessories.
Mark Matousek/Business Insider

The first floor also highlighted A New Day, a women’s clothing line the company launched in August.

The first floor also highlighted A New Day, a women's clothing line the company launched in August.
Mark Matousek/Business Insider

The label’s offerings appear to be aimed at a younger, more fashionable, more urban demographic than one typically associated with Target.

The label's offerings appear to be aimed at a younger, more fashionable, more urban demographic than one typically associated with Target.
Mark Matousek/Business Insider

At the opposite entrance were items meant to appeal to the tourists who often frequent Herald Square.

At the opposite entrance were items meant to appeal to the tourists who often frequent Herald Square.
Mark Matousek/Business Insider

A selection of fresh and portable food was available for customers looking for a quick snack or lunch they could take on the go.

A selection of fresh and portable food was available for customers looking for a quick snack or lunch they could take on the go.
Mark Matousek/Business Insider

After taking the escalator down to the lower floor, we immediately noticed the store’s Halloween offerings, including candy …

After taking the escalator down to the lower floor, we immediately noticed the store's Halloween offerings, including candy ...
Mark Matousek/Business Insider

… costumes …

... costumes ...
Mark Matousek/Business Insider

… and greeting cards.

... and greeting cards.
Mark Matousek/Business Insider

While not always displayed as prominently as on the first floor, Target’s in-house brands were often set apart from other brands’ offerings. Pasta and sauces from the Simply Balanced line were placed at the entrance to an aisle, facing shoppers.

While not always displayed as prominently as on the first floor, Target's in-house brands were often set apart from other brands' offerings. Pasta and sauces from the Simply Balanced line were placed at the entrance to an aisle, facing shoppers.
Mark Matousek/Business Insider

But Target also gave prime display space to local brands like Harry’s, a shaving company based in New York City.

But Target also gave prime display space to local brands like Harry's, a shaving company based in New York City.
Business Insider/Mark Matousek

The store also gave a prominent position to Shea Moisture, which was founded in Harlem.

The store also gave a prominent position to Shea Moisture, which was founded in Harlem.
Mark Matousek/Business Insider
Source: Fast Company

Clothes, like Target’s Goodfellow brand, were given a central location on the bottom floor.

Clothes, like Target's Goodfellow brand, were given a central location on the bottom floor.
Mark Matousek/Business Insider

We were surprised at how many of the clothes seemed to be designed for and marketed to young and fashionable consumers.

We were surprised at how many of the clothes seemed to be designed for and marketed to young and fashionable consumers.
Mark Matousek/Business Insider

The rest of the bottom floor reflected Target’s broader in-store strategy, with a reduced number of discounted items that were displayed more subtly than they might have been.

The rest of the bottom floor reflected Target's broader in-store strategy, with a reduced number of discounted items that were displayed more subtly than they might have been.
Mark Matousek/Business Insider

Beauty products have become a recent point of emphasis for Target. The company recently revamped its beauty sections to feature open plans, eye-level displays, and new lighting designs.

Beauty products have become a recent point of emphasis for Target. The company recently revamped its beauty sections to feature open plans, eye-level displays, and new lighting designs.
Mark Matousek/Business Insider

The same could be said for same-day delivery, which retailers are beginning to roll out to encourage customer loyalty.

The same could be said for same-day delivery, which retailers are beginning to roll out to encourage customer loyalty.
Mark Matousek/Business Insider

The checkout area also had a few notable features. There was a pickup area for orders placed online.

The checkout area also had a few notable features. There was a pickup area for orders placed online.
Mark Matousek/Business Insider

And the registers indicated a trend toward self-checkout.

And the registers indicated a trend toward self-checkout.
Mark Matousek/Business Insider

Overall, the Herald Square location demonstrated Target’s ability to tailor its strategy and offerings to an environment where the competition among retailers is intense.

Overall, the Herald Square location demonstrated Target's ability to tailor its strategy and offerings to an environment where the competition among retailers is intense.
Mark Matousek/Business Insider

This Chicago Startup Sold Its Protein Bar Company for $600 Million–and Never Had Funding

The story of Peter Rahal, co-founder of RXBAR
RXBAR co-founders Jared Smith (left) and Peter Rahal.
“Have you ever had one of these RXBAR’s?” I asked the cashier as I was checking out.
“I actually haven’t, but man do they sell. People here love it and buy it all the time,” the cashier said.
I had just finished interviewing co-founder of RXBAR, Peter Rahal at his local coffee shop in the River North neighborhood of Chicago.
Three weeks prior, Peter and his partner Jared Smith sold their company to Kellogg’s for $600 million.
No venture capital or outside funding–just $5,000 invested by each founder.
The rest is history. Here’s what I learned from Peter.
  1. You don’t need investors to build multimillion dollar company.

“I remember distinctly early in my business when I was asking my dad about all the investor money I needed to fulfill my vision for RXBAR. He told me very directly, ‘You need to shut up and sell 1,000 bars.’.”
That’s all Peter needed to hear. He started walking door to door to coffee shops and cross-fit centers in his neighborhood.
“We would ask to speak to the owner and ask if we could put my bars on their shelves. we gave it away for free. We didn’t care. We just wanted people to start trying them out. We made these bars by hand. There was no huge manufacturing line. It was one bar at a time.
It actually made our due diligence with Kellogg really smooth. We had a clean cap table. We were open books with them. Everything they wanted to know, we had answers for them,” Peter said.

2) Iterate and learn.

The first RXBAR packaging was built in powerpoint.
“I’m not a designer, but Jared and I knew that we needed to get to market as soon as possible, so we opened up powerpoint and created the best packaging we could. I even put my cell phone number on the package. I wanted to make sure I was accessible as possible. Feedback is how we grew,” Peter said. “We knew we were on to something pretty quickly. We went all-in [and] quit our day jobs. [We] moved our operations from mom’s basement and rented a small production space.”
After 5 iterations of packaging:

3) Believe in what you’re selling

We were sick of all these weak ingredients in protein bars. That’s when we decided to make something that was transparent. We knew the market wanted something like this. That’s why we put our core ingredients on the package. It really is NO BS.”
One thing we say is, “We tell you what’s on the inside on the outside.”
I have to say that’s probably one of the best brand promises I’ve heard in a long time.

4) Embrace your differences

“My partner Jared and I are very different. It’s a big reason why he’s been so crucial to the success of this business. I honestly don’t think we would be in business if it wasn’t for him. He enabled us to grow at the pace we are growing, without raising any capital.”
“We had manufacturing and distribution constraints, but we each played a role in solving problems.”
“These constraints helped us stay honest with ourselves, ” says Peter.

5) Culture is everything

“I don’t have a corner office. I sit with everyone else. I actually take most of my calls on speakerphone. I want to set the tone that I have nothing to hide an that we’re all in this together,” Peter said.
He also implemented dynamic job descriptions for his employees.
“Considering the growth we had in a short time frame, it’s important that the roles of our team members change as we grow. Just because you are responsible for one thing when you got hired, doesn’t mean that there aren’t other roles you can grow into. I made sure that was clear from day one.”

6) Just because you sold the company, doesn’t mean your work is done

“Some people might be surprised that I’m still working, but I love it. Also, you don’t sell your company and have LESS work. That’s not how this works! In many respects, we just got started. I still have a great job!”
“We picked [Kellogg’s] as a partner, because we felt they really understood our business, our vision and most importantly, I learned something from them every conversation I had.”

Grocery pickup in 30 minutes or less

By Gina Acosta – 10/30/2017
A new farm-to-fridge player in the online grocery space has launched an express service that offers grocery pickup in 30 minutes or less.
Farmstead, the new AI-powered digital micro-grocer that sources and delivers fresh food from farm-to-fridge in 60 minutes, has launched a new 30-minute Express Pickup service at micro-hubs in San Francisco and San Mateo, Calif. The new service puts Farmstead on par with the largest incumbent players in the rapidly expanding online grocery delivery space, many of whom do not yet offer online order and pick-up services in San Francisco.
“At a time when the tech sector is trying to figure out what the future of grocery shopping will be, we are rolling out a new digital grocer that solves for convenience, food waste, and geographic density,” said Farmstead CEO and co-founder Pradeep Elankumaran. “Our suburban customers requested a free rapid pickup option from their nearby Farmstead hub to help them replace time-consuming last-minute trips to the supermarket – we’re thrilled to bring them this carefully designed, compelling new experience.”
With Farmstead’s new Express Pickup service, groceries are ready for pickup within 30 minutes of placing an online order. When customers arrive at the pickup location they can tap an “I’m here” button on their phone, and a Farmstead employee will place the custom packed grocery order in the car.
“The addition of Express Pickup to Farmstead’s fulfillment model makes it possible to launch lightweight, software-defined hubs anywhere in the US to quickly and easily meet consumer demand, fitting in seamlessly with their existing grocery habits,” said Farmstead product manager Jennelle Nystrom.
Offering Express Pickup service for the first time in San Francisco is the latest step toward Farmstead’s stated goal of fundamentally reinventing the $670B grocery sector. By using AI technology to optimize the sourcing and distribution of food from farms to customers, Farmstead’s fulfillment model is specifically designed to reduce waste.
Founded just 12 months ago, Farmstead has completed over 17,000 deliveries to thousands of Bay Area customers, and has raised $2.8 million in seed funding from Resolute Ventures, Social Capital, Y Combinator, and Joe Montana’s Liquid 2 Ventures.

2017 Warehouse / Distribution Center Survey: In the thick of e-commerce adjustments

As e-commerce fulfillment pressure continues to climb, our annual survey points to the many changes taking hold—from more investment in automated approaches to piece picking, more use of robotics, increased interest in throughput metrics and general process improvement.

During the adaptation of industry trends, there comes a point when you pass the early stages of adjustment and dive into really doing things differently. Our “2017 Warehouse and Distribution Center (DC) Operations Survey” shows us an industry that’s now in the midst of that change—and we’re getting into the thick of e-commerce adjustments.
The tweaks include more investments in automated order picking, voice-directed systems and other technology. We’re also seeing pain points continue to swell; foremost among these is the struggle to find qualified workers. Also emerging are data that suggest respondents may be reshaping their DC networks with smaller facilities to serve as fulfilment centers closer to the point of demand.
The survey, conducted annually by Peerless Research Group (PRG), drew more than 300 responses this year from professionals in logistics and warehouse operations management across multiple verticals. One of the clearest data points, and the issue that is likely driving change of many types, is the level of e-commerce involvement, according to Don Derewecki, a senior consultant with St. Onge Company, and Norm Saenz, Jr., a managing director with St. Onge, a supply chain engineering consulting company and partner for this annual survey.
In fact, 19% of respondents now say they do omni-channel fulfillment, up 3% from last year, while 37% say they do e-commerce, up by 2% from last year. This steady growth in e-commerce and all the pressures that brings around piece picking, labor management, and cycles times, is driving deep change for respondents, notes Derewecki.
“Overall, what we’re seeing and what seems to be consistent with the study results is that there is more of requirement for speed and accuracy, driven very much by e-commerce expectations,” says Derewecki.
In response, the survey shows that some technologies that had been flat the last few years are on the increase this year. Many of these involved each picking that is a hallmark of e-commerce fulfillment, notes Saenz. “The investments are increasing a bit more for certain areas like voice, pick- to-light, and put walls, which points to operators applying some technology to e-commerce pressures,” says Saenz.
The annual survey of decision makers for warehouse/DC operations spans multiple areas, including facility; labor and other operations trends; use of technology; capital expenditure levels; and use of metrics. We also ask about disruptions from natural disasters. And with the disastrous hurricane season of 2017 fresh on people’s minds when the survey was in the field, the response for this question jumped, with 15% saying they had experienced a catastrophic event, up from just 6% in 2016.
Most participating companies came from manufacturing (46%), followed by distributors (27%), third-party logistics providers (11%) and retailers (6%). Leading verticals included food & grocery, automotive & aerospace, general merchandize, electronics, fabricated metals, and paper products.

Operations snapshot

In recent years, the survey has trended toward “more” as the norm when it comes to factors like facility clear heights and labor forces. This year’s survey results, however, has some data that runs contrary to these recent trends, but is consistent on others like the nature of inbound and outbound shipments, as well as the steady march of e-commerce.
For 2017, 14% of respondents handle full pallets on the outbound side, up from 9% last year. On the inbound side, full pallet was only at 13%, which is the same as last year. On the outbound side, 45% handle full pallet, case and split case, while 24% handle case and split case, for a total of 69% for those two answers, the same as last year. Thus, while the response for outbound “full pallet only” grew slightly, the outbound profile is relatively consistent.
Wholesale (67%) and retail (58%) remain the most common channels serviced, with wholesale staying equal to the previous year’s 67%, and the response for retail down by 2%. This year, 37% say that they service an e-commerce channel, up from 35% in 2016. Additionally, 19% say they have an omni-channel service environment, up from 16% last year.
While there is likely some overlap on these answers, 56% now say they service omni-channel or e-commerce needs.
How channels are being fulfilled—in terms of using third-partly logistics (3PL) sites, servicing channels in-house (self-distributed) from one DC, or self-distributed with separate DCs for different channels—also experienced some change. Those saying they self-distribute for all channels from one DC fell from 42% last year to 37% for 2017, while 30% now say they self-distribute with separate DCs for different channels, up from 24% in 2016.
The survey’s findings on inventory where slightly different from the previous year. The average number of SKUs declined to 13,130 this year from 13,774 the previous year. The percentage of SKUs that are conveyable or can be handled robotically was 29%, down from 36% the year previous. Annual inventory turns for 2017 came in at 8.5 turns, a decline from 9.2 turns the year previous.
While more turns is typically desirable, a couple of factors may be playing into the slower movement. One, notes Derewecki, is that the cost of financing remains low, so there is less cost involved in carrying more inventory than if rates were higher.
The widening of the Panama Canal and enhancements to some U.S. ports to accommodate larger freighters also has tended to increase the volume of cargo that can be imported at an attractive cost. Such factors may be contributing to a tendency to carry more inventory, notes Derewecki, in addition to the need to maintain high service levels for multiple channels.
At the same time that some of these macro-level factors may be driving inventory levels higher, respondents are after better, tighter inventory control. In fact, when asked about actions taken to lower operating costs, “improving inventory control” was the second most common answer, with a 63% affirmative response, up from 60% the previous year.

DCs and labor forces

The trend toward “bigger, taller and more” when it comes to facilities and labor altered slightly for the 2017 survey. For example, when asked about most common square footage for buildings in the DC network, the average for 2017 was 193,190 sq. ft., down slightly from 199,040 feet last year.
Average clear height of buildings was 29.8 feet for 2017, down from 31.1 feet in 2016, and 30.8 feet the year previous. However, 27% of respondents said that clear height ranged from 30 feet to 39 feet, up 1% from 2016.
Total square footage in the network averaged 473,400 sq. ft., down from 539,00. The median dropped as well, from 240,410 to 176,600, while the “mega-sized” DC network response (two million sq. ft. or more) stayed at 10%.
When it comes to the most common square footage for a single DC, when the network is four buildings or more, the average square footage for 2017 was 264,675, up slightly from 264,445 last year. For networks of three buildings or less, the average square footage was 159,510 in 2017, down from 178,090 last year, but very close to the 158,955 sq. ft. back in 2015.
Why the shift in facility and DC network sizes? To some extent, there is natural variation year to year due to different sets of respondents. Another factor at play may be the growth of e-commerce, notes Saenz. With industrial real estate availability tight, and a growing need to service e-commerce orders quickly, it may be that some operators are opening relatively smaller fulfillment centers versus big DCs that service traditional channels and large regions.
“I think e-commerce is really starting to drive some of the survey results we’re seeing, even in areas like clear heights or smaller facilities,” says Saenz. “Buildings last a long time, so some smaller facilities built decades ago may be getting repurposed as fulfillment centers for e-commerce. Also, I think the growth in e-commerce volume has pushed the need to have the inventory and processes set up in a separate building. As a result, some of the findings that at first glance seem confusing start to make sense once you realize that e-commerce growth is driving various changes.”
When asked about DC expansion plans, 23% said that they plan to expand square footage, down slightly from 27% last year. However, 17% say they plan to expand the number of buildings, up 3% from 2016. Employee/labor expansion plans for DCs also are on the rise. Over the next 12 months, 36% are foreseeing expansion in the number of employees, up from 33% last year.
The number of employees in a DC network trended slightly downward. For 2017, the average number of employees for a network was 228, down from 278 in 2016. However, the 1,000-plus employee bracket drew a 12% response, up slightly from 10% in 2016.
The “less than 25” employee bracket grew significantly, while the 500 to 999 employee range decreased from a 11% response in 2016, to just 5% this year. These changes might be due to a different mix of respondents, or deeper shifts in DC networks that may be developing.
Capital expenditures continued the general growth pattern of recent years. The average current capex reached $1.43 million in 2017, up from $1.37 million last year. Median capex increased from $242.95 million last year to $250,000 this year.
When it comes to estimated capex for the next year, the average projection is $1.51 million, up from $1.39 million from last year, while the median for projection comes to $303.19, down from $358.69 the previous year. “There’s some new level of investment that’s indicated,” notes Saenz. “It’s not an outrageous increase, but consistent with what might be expected in trying to handle e-commerce more efficiently.”

Solutions and metrics

The types of technology investments respondents are interested in generally align with the pressures of e-commerce order picking and fulfillment. For instance, 10% indicated that they use some form of automated order picking, up from 3% from last year and the 7% from 2015.
Among specific picking technologies, 12% say they are using a “parts-to-person” system, up from 10% in 2016.
Voice assisted solutions with no scanning came in 7%, up from 3%, while voice with scan verification was also 7%, down 1% from the previous year. Robotic or other automated technology was in use by 5% of respondents, up from 3% last year. Use of automated storage and retrieval systems was up by 1%, while automated guided vehicle use grew from 3% to 6%.
When it comes to “order filling” techniques, 20% use a “put” to order method, up from 15% in 2016. Use of put walls also grew by 2%.
Use of warehouse management system (WMS) software, from various types of vendors as well as legacy/homegrown, grew from 83% across all types last year to 87% this year. Best of breed WMS grew slightly from 11% to 13%, but somewhat surprisingly, so did the response for use of legacy systems, up by 7%.
While it’s possible that packaged solutions from ERP and WMS vendors have been around so long that some consider older packaged solutions as legacy, the overall trend is that WMS is in use at the vast majority of respondent locations. In keeping with that use level, 60% of respondents say their primary data collection method to gauge productivity is “automated through a WMS,” up from 59% last year. Manual data collection methods are used by 55% of respondents, down from 57% last year.
Overall, the technology portion of the survey reflects that operators are layering in more automation, though not necessarily big ticket, fixed automation systems. “The e-commerce world drives the need for more labor, and as a result, you have the need to use some forms or automation to give you the productivity gains you need,” says Saenz.
Derewecki agrees that there is strong interest in technology as a means of dealing with the labor-intensive requirements of e-commerce, especially solutions that are quick to reconfigure and change as DC workflows evolve.
“There is greater interest in flexible technology solutions like voice-directed solutions or RF-directed picking, and to some extent, robotics,” says Derewecki. “Generally, the technologies of interest are all trending with the piece picking volumes associated with e-commerce. Companies are interested in finding ways to fulfill orders with fewer people, because people aren’t easily available right now.”
The percentage of respondents using some type of productivity metric grew from 82% last year to 86% this year. Common metrics used include units/pieces per hour (44%), orders per hour (34%), cases per hour (27%) and lines per hour 26%. Use of “percent of an engineered standard” remained at 17%, the same as last year. Metrics that gained a bigger response this year were units/pieces per hour, orders per hour, and lines per hour.
Respondents continue to take a range of actions to lower operating costs, with 95% taking an action of some kind. Common actions include improving warehouse processes (70%), while 63% tell us they’re trying to improve inventory control, an action that grew by 3% over 2016. Changing racking and layouts increased by 5%, while reducing staff as a means of lowering costs decreased to 21% this year from the 23% who used that as a cost reduction measure in 2016.
Survey findings show continued strong use of metrics as well as interest in cost management methods such as improving warehouse processes and inventory control—pointing to an industry that wants to streamline and standardize as much as possible, both to manage costs and to respond to customer expectations.
“Companies are looking to standardize processes as part of making it easier to comply with rising customer expectations for quality and turnaround time,” says Derewecki. “There is an increasing emphasis on continuous improvement—on streamlining and standardizing—as a means of managing costs and delivering more value to customers.”

Labor as top issue

Given the picking, packing and shipping tasks associated with e-commerce, it’s not surprising that the inability to attract and retain labor has become the top industry pain point. Whereas last year, “insufficient space for inventory or operations” remained the leading pain point, this year it gave way to the inability to find hourly workers, which grew from 41% last year to 49% this year.
The insufficient space issue—at 40% this year—still ranked number two on the list of major issues, followed by inadequate information systems support (36% this year) and outdated storage, picking, or material handling equipment (33%). What’s more, the fifth most cited issue—the inability to attract and retain qualified supervision—shot up from 11% in 2016 to 25% this year.
“There is a lot of competition to find and retain good, quality employees, so DCs are struggling to find good people,” says Saenz. “This issue is driven in large part by the increase in smaller order handling. E-commerce is driving change in terms of space, different types of facilities, for people, as well as automation.”
For the first time in recent years, the percentage of respondents performing value added services (VAS) reached 90%. Frequently cited types of VAS include special labelling (54%), lot number control (34%), product assembly (31%), serial number control (30%), and kitting (29%). Of these, assembly was up by 4% and kitting by 3%.
The majority of respondents (64%) report that their systems have SKU weight and dimension data in their item masters. This is down from 68% last year, but only 12% see it as a major industry issue, just like last year.
The survey includes an open-ended comment section about “significant change” respondents are seeing. And while responses vary, common comments included adding 3PLs, becoming more automated, adding space or racking, implementing technologies like voice picking or RF scanning, concerns about finding labor or improving the workforce, improving warehouse processes.
These types of comments make sense in the current environment. E-commerce is marching on, the economy is good, so challenges operators have been experiencing the last few years are only accelerating, concludes Derewecki.
“E-commerce has really become a game changer in warehouse operations,” says Derewecki. “When you couple that with the expectation that the general economy will get better, it puts increasing pressures on DCs on many fronts—on turnaround times, on being able to find more space on short notice, or finding good hourly workers and supervisors.”
As a result, Derewecki adds that we will continue seeing operators trying to standardize and upgrade processes, and applying some automation. “They’re automating where it’s justified, to reduce the long-term dependence on a large labor force, and also, to be readily able to absorb surges in demand.”

These are the 10 highest-grossing restaurants in America

tao las vegasRestaurant Business’ list of the highest-grossing independent restaurants has been topped by the same spot for the fourth year in a row.Facebook/TAO
  • Restaurant Business magazine ranks the highest-grossing independent restaurants each year.
  • This year’s top 10 featured many of the same names as last year.
  • Each was able to bring in over $20 million in gross food and beverage sales.

Independent restaurants are on the rise as customers are increasingly turning away from national chains. Still, it’s difficult to run a restaurant without the benefit of a recognizable brand, which makes it all the more impressive that some independent restaurants are able to bring in tens of millions of dollars in sales each year.
These are the 10 highest-grossing independent restaurants, according to Restaurant Business magazine. All stats are for 2017, and only restaurants with five or fewer locations were considered.

10. Gibsons Bar and Steakhouse — Chicago

10. Gibsons Bar and Steakhouse — Chicago
Facebook/Gibsons Bar & Steakhouse
The Chicago institution is the only steakhouse in the country to receive a USDA Prime Certification for the beef it sources in-house.
Sales: $24,700,825
Average Check: $75
Meals Served: 363,301

9. Bryant Park Grill & Café — New York City

Located behind the New York Public Library, Bryant Park Grill & Café has been called “a gorgeous pavilion” by The New York Times.
Sales: $25,400,000
Average Check: $50 (Restaurant Business magazine estimate)
Meals Served: 420,000

8. Smith & Wollensky — New York City

The restaurant is known for its National Wine Week celebrations, which occur three times each year. It’s also a favorite of Warren Buffett.
Sales: $25,961,337
Average Check: $100
Meals Served: 296,723

7. Lavo New York — New York City

7. Lavo New York — New York City
Tracy Chung for Business Insider
This Italian restaurant doubles as an exclusive nightclub.
Sales: $26,822,655
Average Check: $85
Meals Served: 200,000

6. The Boathouse Orlando — Orlando, Florida

Aside from fresh seafood, the restaurant also offers tours of Disney Springs via boats designed to look like classic cars.
Sales: $30,814,369
Average Check: $43
Meals Served: 643,829

5. Old Ebbitt Grill — Washington, DC

One of only two restaurants to break the 1 million mark, Old Ebbitt Grill served more meals than any other restaurant on Restaurant Business’ list.
Sales: $32,662,051
Average Check: $39
Meals Served: 1,072,293

4. Carmine’s — New York City

The Italian restaurant now delivers.
Sales: $33,147,017
Average Check: $33
Meals Served: 396,871

3. Tao Downtown — New York City

Despite its impressive revenue, Tao Downtown has received less impressive reviews.
Sales: $33,401,819
Average Check: $95
Meals Served: 311,945

2. Joe’s Stone Crab — Miami Beach, Florida

Barack Obama was reported to have had Joe’s Stone Crab delivered before a presidential debate in 2012.
Sales: $37,243,159
Average Check: $80
Meals Served: 316,000

1. Tao Las Vegas — Las Vegas

Tao Las Vegas topped this list for the fourth year in a row as the only independent restaurant to bring in over $40 million last year.
Sales: $42,470,345
Average Check: $90
Meals Served: 226,146